OnQue Technologies, Inc.

Home


 

Products


 

Demo


 

COBRA Tips


 

Support


 

Download


 

Contact


 

Links


 

About


 

For Brokers Only

 

COBRA Tips

A Service of OnQue Technologies, Inc.
See how easy COBRA administration can be...
 
What Is Your ERISA Fiduciary Duty To Beneficiaries?
August 14, 2003
Santa Rosa, CA

Employers and plan administrators who administer COBRA continuation coverage (and other benefits plans) have a special duty under federal law to protect the interests and rights of participants and beneficiaries. This is known as the ERISA fiduciary duty, or the duty of loyalty. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that plan participants and beneficiaries may bring individual claims under ERISA for breach of this duty, separate from the statutory penalties available for failing to properly administer benefits plans. Unfortunately, the law provides only general guidance as to who is a fiduciary and what constitutes a breach of duty. The Department of Labor (DOL) advises that fiduciary responsibility will depend on the specific facts of each situation.

This COBRA Tip discusses the fiduciary responsibilities employers have to plan participants and beneficiaries under ERISA, and makes reference to a recent federal court case, Weeks v. Western Auto Supply, in which an employer was sued because its Human Resources Manager supplied wrong information to a COBRA beneficiary. Although the Weeks case was ultimately dismissed, other courts have ruled against employers in very similar fact situations. Defending against breach of duty lawsuits can be very expensive, whether won or lost.

Who is an ERISA fiduciary?
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) is the federal law that governs standards for health and retirement plans administered by private sector employers. It requires plans to provide participants with accurate information regarding benefits and imposes fiduciary duties on anyone who exercises discretionary control or authority over benefits plans.

Before deciding whether a breach of duty has occurred, it is necessary first to define "fiduciary" for ERISA purposes. A person who acts in a fiduciary relationship to another is held to a higher legal standard than an ordinary person, who may be merely negligent when committing erroneous acts that harm another. Fiduciaries hold plan assets in trust for beneficiaries and administer benefits under those plans; therefore they have a special legal duty to act in the best interests of those beneficiaries.

ERISA specifically defines a person or entity as a plan fiduciary if that person:
  • Exercises any discretionary authority or discretionary control respecting management of the benefits plan, or disposition of its assets; or
  • Has any discretionary authority or discretionary responsibility in the administration of the benefits plan.
The Department of Labor (DOL), which enforces ERISA, explains: "Fiduciary status is not just a matter of title. If a person exercises the requisite authority over plan administration, then that person is a fiduciary." The Weeks case was dismissed because the judge didn't think the employer's designated Human Resources Manager was an ERISA fiduciary.

What are a fiduciary's duties?
The primary responsibility of fiduciaries is to administer the benefits plan solely in the interest of participants and beneficiaries for the purpose of providing benefits. Fiduciaries must follow the terms of plan documents to the extent that the terms of the plan are consistent with the law under ERISA. A breach of this duty can occur through affirmative acts or inaction, and "courts can take whatever action is appropriate against fiduciaries that breach their duties under ERISA," according to the DOL.

When faced with the issue, many courts have ruled that ERISA fiduciaries have a duty to disclose truthful and complete information, particularly when specific inquiries are made regarding benefits. In one such case, an employer breached its duty by failing to inform a beneficiary about COBRA election rights when asked about conversion rights under a health plan. A breach of duty can also occur when a fiduciary makes false representations regarding employee benefits. When faced with the issue, many courts have ruled that ERISA fiduciaries have a duty to disclose truthful and complete information, particularly when specific inquiries are made regarding benefits. In one such case, an employer breached its duty by failing to inform a beneficiary about COBRA election rights when asked about conversion rights under a health plan. A breach of duty can also occur when a fiduciary makes false representations regarding employee benefits.

How is "discretionary authority" determined?
The judge in Weeks v. Western Auto Supply took a very literal view of the definition of fiduciary, and the outcome seems clearly harsh from the beneficiary's point of view. Given the same set of facts, other courts have not been so strict in their interpretation of the ERISA duty, ruling that employers can be liable for breach of duty based on the acts of employees. For example, in a successful suit against Wal-Mart, the beneficiary was instructed to consult a service representative about obtaining health coverage. He did so, and was given incorrect advice. In that case, a federal appeals court noted that when an employee of the plan administrator gives misleading information, which beneficiaries are justified in relying upon, then the plan may be sued for breach of fiduciary duty.

Conclusion: Despite the court's ruling in Weeks that the Human Resources Manager was not a fiduciary, it would be a mistake to conclude that employees and others who act in official capacities on behalf of a benefits plan are merely functionaries immune to charges of breach of duty. Whether a person acts as a fiduciary under ERISA when administering COBRA will be decided in each case, taking into consideration the amount of decision-making authority the person has, how much he or she knows about the operations of the benefits plan, and to what extent the person has authority to act on behalf of the plan. Whether or not you agree with the outcome in the Weeks case, remember that administration of rights and benefits under group health plans carries with it a high level of duty for the protection of the plan's beneficiaries. To avoid allegations of breach of duty, it is important to provide beneficiaries with as much information about benefits as possible, particularly when responding to specific inquiries.

For general information about ERISA, click here: Department of Labor Employment Benefits Security Administration

 
Related Court Case
HR Manager Gives Wrong Information About COBRA Benefits
This information is provided by OnQue Technologies, Inc. for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If legal advice or other professional assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Click here to view past tips: Tips Archive 
OnQue Technologies, Inc.
 
Copyright © 2003 OnQue Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.